Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k  
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. - life cycle management for your 401k
What Are Life Cycle Options?
Why Life Cycle Options?
How to Choose Your Life Cycle Options?

What Are Life Cycle Options?

  • Fully diversified single investment option that is matched to participants' goals, risk tolerance, and investment time horizon
  • Professional investment management and asset allocation based on fund's objective on an ongoing basis
  • Integral part of prudent investment menu design for choice plans



Why Life Cycle Options?

Life Cycle Options Do Work:

  • Manning & Napier's white paper, A Solution to Participant Confusion, details an approach that has resulted in life cycle participation rates in excess of 50%1. The paper cites three actual case examples of how Manning & Napier's technique of integrating menu design and communication has worked to reach out to participants. 

1 See participation rate details on page 17 of the “A Solution to Participant Confusion” link above.

Benefits to Participants:
  • One-Stop Investment Shopping - Participants can choose a fully diversified, single investment option with asset allocation already done right within the fund.
  • Professional Asset Allocation - Investment experts allocate fund assets on an ongoing basis to meet the fund's objective.
  • Retirement Investing Made Easy - Participants simply decide which objective is the best fit based on their personal situation and leave the rest to the experts.
Benefits to Sponsors:
  • Prudent Menu Design - Sponsors avoid the risk of forcing participants to translate their basic investment objectives into a specific mix of stock and bond funds.
  • Less Educational Burden - Sponsors no longer have to attempt to educate all participants to the level of a savvy investor.
  • Satisfied Participants - Sponsors that use life cycle options in conjunction with appropriate asset class options provide a well-rounded menu design that may satisfy all types of participants.
  • Reduced Fiduciary Liability - Sponsors who design a plan menu around the premise that participants have varying levels of investment expertise take a key step toward managing fiduciary liability.



How to Choose Your Life Cycle Options

Family of Life Cycle Options Rather  than Individual Asset Allocation Funds
Select a coordinated family of life cycle options from a single manager. Select several "balanced" or "asset allocation" funds from different managers.
Benefit: Offers a range of distinct options that allows employees at each different investment time horizon and risk level to take advantage of professional asset allocation. Drawback: Can increase participant confusion over the differences between alternative options. Participant decisions are likely to be based on name recognition of the managers and short-term performance, clearly in contrast with the objectives of a well-designed participant menu.






Managed Portfolio Rather  than Fund-of-Funds
Fund assets consist of individual securities both equity and fixed income. Fund assets consist of other mutual funds. Each underlying fund manager operates independent of the other funds.
Benefit: Allows the best opportunity for a manager to provide value-added returns on a consistent basis. Drawback: Can lead to over-diversification and a lack of coordinated risk management. Can also result in payment of multiple management fees (For example, for a life cycle fund, fees are charged by both the life cycle fund and the underlying funds.) often for generic asset allocation and index-like performance.





Actively Managed Rather  than Passively Managed
A professional investment manager constantly adjusts the allocations in the portfolio to attain an appropriate asset mix for the fund's objective on a forward-looking basis. The expected trade-off between risk and return for each asset class is based on today's market and economic environment - not historical averages. A static mix of stocks and bonds is maintained based on historical data regarding the typical return and volatility of those asset types. The investments will remain in this particular mix of assets regardless of what the market is doing.
Benefit: Maximizes the risk-adjusted rate of return through value analysis as market conditions change. This is key to a life cycle option meeting its investment objective over different market and economic environments. Drawback: Can fail to achieve even modest return targets over long periods of time because passively managed funds are not able to take advantage of favorable market conditions and offer no protection during difficult markets. A preset passive mix may not meet the fund’s stated objective.







Long-Term Track Record Rather  than Short-Term Track Record
A value-added history of making asset allocation decisions over long-term time periods, including dampening market volatility in the tough times and participating in capital growth during bull market environments, is most relevant in assessing a manager's track record. Academic studies confirm that performance rankings over calendar year time periods provide little predictive power. Short-term time periods (e.g., rolling 1, 3, and 5 year periods) are dominated by either a bull market in which more aggressive managers will have the best relative performance, or a bear market in which conservative managers have the advantage.
Benefit: Evaluating risk and return through both bear and bull markets shows how effective a multi-asset class manager has been in achieving the portfolio's objectives over a full range of environments. Drawback: A life cycle fund manager who lacks experience with multi-asset class fund management through both bull and bear markets does not illustrate the capability to effectively achieve the portfolio's objectives over a variety of market conditions.